The name ‘BlackRock’ is not commonly uttered on the street, but it is the richest and most powerful company in the world, due to its ubiquitous ownership of some of the leading companies globally. Name a company in any area of human endeavor, be it finance, defense, education, agriculture, medicine, or the media, and it is either owned by BlackRock or part-owned by the Goliath company.
What exactly is BlackRock? In one sentence, BlackRock is the social media of finance. In other words, it is to global finance what social media is to information. It is, in fact, the capo di tutti capi of conglomerates and, arguably, the force behind the World Bank, which goes by the nomenclature of the International Monetary Fund (IMF).
But its major role, or even its ‘raison d’être,’ is to represent the global interest of Zionism, which appears to be in perpetual opposition to God, and the unapologetic support of the worship of anything Satanic (anti-Christ), globally. It manifests itself in many ways but hides from the uninitiated in the world.
By choice, Zionists never become kings but only kingmakers in the Western world, upon whom they exert overbearing control and influence, politically and socially. Even the Jews themselves do not align with or support the extremism of Zionism. Many Rabbis (Jewish clerics) have expressed their disagreement with Zionism and what it stands for anywhere in the world.
A denial of the so-called Holocaust would earn one outright condemnation from the Western world or even elimination. However, the same West not only arms and allows Zionists to perpetrate their own modern-day Holocaust on the Palestinians but denies that it is happening. According to the Western world, what the Zionists are doing to the Palestinians is ‘self-defense.’
The recent article written by the new British Prime Minister, Sir Keir Starmer, the longtime Labour leader, and published by The Sun newspaper, is a clear example of Zionism at work. In the article, the Labour Party Prime Minister spoke strongly against the presence of Islam and Muslims in Europe, insinuating that they were adulterating Western culture. He also wrongly expressed the belief that the advancement made by the Western world was entirely based on scientific breakthroughs, failing to mention that many of the sciences, especially mathematics, medicine, and others, were pioneered by Arabs, such as Al Jabir, who founded and popularized Algebra, an Arabic word.
But King Charles of England spoke in opposition to the Prime Minister’s wrongful insinuations. In an address at Buckingham Palace, the British monarch rightly observed that there was no way to deny the contributions of Islamic and Muslim culture to the development of Western civilization, arguing that Islam is part of both the past and present of British culture.
He categorically stated, “Some of what I say will undoubtedly provoke disagreement. There are nearly 500 mosques in Britain. Popular interest in Islamic culture in Britain is growing fast. Islam is all around us, and yet distrust and even fear persist. Our newspapers love to peddle those unthinking prejudices. Because we have tended to see Islam as the enemy of the West, we have tended to ignore or erase its great contributions to our history in science, astronomy, mathematics (Algebra itself is an Arabic word), law, medicine, history, pharmacology, optics, agriculture, architecture, and psychology. Islam nurtured and preserved the quest for learning. Islam is part of our past and present. It has helped to create modern Europe. These people, ladies and gentlemen, are an asset to Britain.”
It is, however, feared that the King’s speech might not be reported by the mainstream media because it does not fit the narrative of Zionism, which is always opposed to anything Islamic.
The Zionists would go to any length to make the world see things from their very narrow prism, which would unfortunately be falsely propagated by the Western world.
The Zionists created the Lesbian, Bisexual, Gays, Transgender, and Queer (LGBTQ+) movement and forced it onto the world stage, which some Afro-Americans see as a subtle form of birth control targeting Africans, with Nigeria being a particular focus. The prevalence of LGBTQ+ support groups in the country may point to this sinister motive. Some organizations, including those supposed to be religious, have latched onto this bizarre and ungodly culture, advising their followers to embrace it fully. This has caused vehement refusal by most members, which has, in turn, led to splits in such organizations, much to the delight of the creators of this anti-God culture.
It is a debasement, to put it mildly, that religious organizations or people who profess belief in the Creator of Heaven and Earth would even contemplate supporting the ideals of LGBTQ+ and expect others to follow suit.
Such groups in Nigeria include, but are not limited to, Women’s Health and Equal Rights Initiative (WHER), Women Health Empowerment and Emancipation Initiative (WHEEI) in Zamfara state, and Intersex Nigeria, Youth Health and Rights Initiative, Advocacy and Empowerment (YOHRIAE), and Initiative for Sexual Reproductive Health and Rights Awareness (ISRHRA).
Others are The Initiative for Equal Rights (TIERS), International Centre for Advocacy on Rights to Health (ICARH), Advocacy for Justice and Equality Nigeria, Women Initiative for Sustainable Environment (WISE), Bisi Alimi Foundation, and ArewaMetoo.
They have also introduced all forms of freedoms into the world to challenge God’s divine decisions on several issues that affect human existence. Such so-called freedoms include child rights, where a child can sue their parents for asking them to do something they do not want to, and girl-child rights (including the right of a girl to have “safe” sex and use condoms, regardless of age), as well as freedom of religion, expression, speech, choice, and assembly.
During the Greek period, the forebearers of today’s Zionists created a concept of leadership called democracy, which challenged God’s divine authority, where the religious leader is the ruler. The Zionists’ democracy insisted that religion and the state must operate separately in an ambiguous system of government known as secularism—another name for godlessness.
Politicians in Nigeria can be likened to Zionists in some aspects. They would like to, and indeed have, dominated everything. They or their associates control the most wealth in the country and can do as they please. Unlike the Zionists, however, Nigerian politicians are not content to be kingmakers; they must be kings themselves, regardless of how it is achieved.
The so-called influential people of today should ask themselves about the whereabouts of President (Alhaji) Shehu Shagari and the 19 “powerful” governors of his time. The President and 17 of the 19 governors are now deceased, and the remaining two are no longer powerful. A new set has taken over that role, and Nigeria moves on without them.
Many of today’s leaders are in love with money, acquiring vast amounts of it, and still appear unsatisfied, wanting more just for the purpose of flaunting their “arrival” and denying others the benefit of enjoying the commonwealth.
Nigeria may be the only country where leaders do not feel threatened by allegations against them, even though they may subtly believe in the truth of those allegations. The country’s vetting agencies and the National Assembly (NASS) do not seem to be doing their jobs well. Otherwise, individuals of questionable integrity should not pass scrutiny at all.
Recently, the President and Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces of Nigeria, Senator Bola Ahmed Tinubu, commanded the Chief of General Staff, General Alexander Musa, to bring the banditry kingpins in the country to him dead or alive within 24 hours. This followed public outcry and allegations of connivance and support for the bandits, made by an Islamic cleric against a ranking federal government official. In some hours, the capo di tutti capi of the bandits, Halilu Subulu, was eliminated by the military.
Now, the top government official in question ought to have resigned and allowed the professionals to do their job to the best of their ability. But this does not happen in a land where the general populace is the least concern of those in power. For them, the only people and things that matter are themselves, their superiors, their immediate families, and, of course, their bottomless pockets.
Such people become “glued” to their seats due to fear of the unknown. Top office holders remain out of reach of anti-graft agencies such as the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) and the Independent Corrupt Practices Commission (ICPC) while in office. Once they are out, they become vulnerable to these agencies and other security bodies, who are supposed to be doing a paid job.
This explains the mad rush by former officials to flee the country on the proverbial first available plane once they are out of office in this land of non-performance but self-service.
Only four sets of people escape the anti-graft agencies: the President and Vice President; those who have agreed to a plea bargain with the government to return a fraction of what they “helped” themselves to from the commonwealth; those who are perpetually in court because they allegedly grease palms; and those with nothing to hide, who can hold their heads high and walk unmolested.
A message for Mr. President: As you are committed to ending banditry in the country and other forms of insecurity, it is sincerely hoped that you will also focus on providing uninterrupted power supply, which is still a luxury for many Nigerians. Despite the country’s enormous wealth in resources, electricity remains out of reach for the average Nigerian.
Lest Mr. President needs reminding, you once promised to provide 24-hour electricity during your first
Labaran wrote from Abuja.
